![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| A serious problem confronts many companies today –– the difficulty they have attracting workers and retaining them. Some must replace up to 70% of their workforce each and every year. There are industries in which the average turnover rate is 30%. Why is this a serious problem? Not too long ago when a study was made of the manufacturing companies in the S&P 500, for example, 80% of their assets were in capital equipment and tangible goods. The remaining 20% of assets were intangibles, related somewhat to labor. Today, that allocation has been turned upside down. Now 80% of an average company’s assets are intangible, and most of that is wrapped up in the quality of the workers. (See exhibit, page 132..) Today’s paradigm is knowledge and information, and this requires businesses to look at the “machines of knowledge” (i.e. labor) differently. The entire process of acquiring, managing and maintaining this new “machine” is changing. Like an asset it must be selected, recruited, installed (brought on board and oriented), scheduled into the process (assigned a job and task) and maintained (trained, provided benefits and supervised). Like equipment, labor has a life cycle that involves teambuilding, gaining tribal knowledge, promotions and mentoring. Eventually it will be retired and replaced with younger assets. The problem is, there’s a limited supply of this resource and quality can be hard to come by. The investments companies make in labor are significant and not enough is done to protect that investment and make certain it remains through maturity. The price to recruit and train new people is substantial and lost productivity while new hires are in the learning mode is costly. A generally accepted measurement of the cost to a company to replace an employee is 30 per cent of the employee’s annual salary. Let’s examine one case. The company has to replace about 300 employees a year. If each one earns $20,000 per year on average, the cost would amount to $1.8 million ($20,000 x 30% = $6,000 x 300 employees = $1.8M). That’s a lot of money for which the employer gets absolutely noth- ing but headaches. But lost productivity and a big bill for Advil weren’t the only downsides. Consider the tremendous drag this created on the organization’s quality of service. It takes time for newcomers to get up to speed. The more that people do a job, the more experience they have under their belts, and the better they get at it. The truth is, new people are likely to make mistakes because they don’t yet know the ropes. High turnover creates a limited pool of talent for promotion and makes business continuity a real challenge. How can an automated time and attendance system help in keeping employees on board? One way may be to involve them directly in scheduling the shifts they work. This will give them a measure of control over their lives and a sense of involvement. As Michael Abrams said, empowerment is an appealing aspect of work life. How does this work? Some software | applications allow employees to go on line and enter their names on the shift they wish to work. If tenured employees have first dibs, the system can be configured to grant those with seniority exclusive access to the process during a specified period of time. Workers can also register their preferences for working certain schedules. This communication allows the employer to be a better “fit” for the employee’s work-life schedule. As everyone knows, both parents work in man families, and there are more and more single parent households. It’s no wonder a work schedule that conflicts with family needs can be much more than inconvenient, which is why a scheduling system that takes into account an individual’s availability gives that employee a sense of control and respect. Several strong products have been introduced to the market in recent years that provide robust, flexible staffing solutions that are integrated with time and attendance software. All the major vendors offer a scheduling module with self-scheduling capabilities and templates for building schedules based on business needs. Each have various “bells and whistles” to answer the market’s demand for intelligent scheduling. Some of the underlying functionality differs, however, so purchasers need to be sure to understand their company’s operational needs before watching a vendor’s demo. These programs are not all alike; each offers a unique package of features. Knowing what to look for will allow a prospective purchaser to stay in the driver’s seat and understand the differences. The management of a large hospital network in the Fort Lauderdale area decided to go with API Software’s ActiveStaffer solution. In spite of being in an industry plagued with high turnover, this particular organization had a very low turnover rate. I believe part of the reason could be due to its use of automated self-scheduling. Schedules at this hospital network are electronically posted, and employees have 45 days to sign up for shifts. Four years ago, when management elected to go with an automated scheduling solution, one hospital was using ANSOS nurse scheduling and two facilities were still using paper systems. None of these could be integrated with other workforce systems. All required double entry, were difficult to compile, and were not user friendly. No wonder schedulers were happy to have the benefits of a new system that eliminated those issues. The new system also was able to project when an employee would begin earning overtime, so that managers could now minimize overworking employees and level the workload. Nobody likes bearing the burden of working more than everyone else, so it’s easy to see how this solution brought more satisfaction to workers. When Kronos engaged Nucleus Research to study the impact of Kronos’ workforce technology, Nucleus found that when nurses were given the ability to self-schedule, total absenteeism went down by 25% and turnover dropped by 20%. This shows Click here to read more. | |||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| One big user of time and attendance technology is the Chicago Public School System. Chicago is the third largest school district in the county, and it’s the biggest employer in Chicago, with 58,000 employees, 620 loca- tions, 435,000 students, and an annual payroll budget of about $2.3 billion. The Chicago schools have been using automated time and attendance for about fifteen years as of this writing. I spoke with Mike Edwards, Deputy Chief Fiscal Officer, about their system from Kronos, Inc. He says the technology has been helpful in a number of instances, but one in particular is its handling of the different ways Chicago teachers get paid. Edwards estimates about 8,000 different types of buckets or positions they can work in exist. Which one a worker fills depends on whether he or she is an hourly worker or salaried, what jobs she performs, union rules, and so on. This was not easy to administer in a manual set up, but a computerized system keeps it all straight without missing a beat. But there’s more. Before Chicago’s system was instituted, each employee at each of the 600-plus schools had to fill out paper time sheets. | At that time, the system had about 42,000 employees. Clerks would collect these and transcribe them to summary sheets. All this paper had to be transported to a central location and be key punched by data entry personnel. In a paper system of this magnitude, mistakes were bound to occur. Edwards estimates there were about 48,000 adjustments annually because of errors and omissions. Not surprisingly, people got upset when they were not paid correctly. In a highly unionized situation such as this one, workers and teachers would complain to their unions, and the unions would file complaints. Edwards says you cannot imagine the disruption. The school system’s labor agreements allowed employees who experienced a payroll error to leave the classroom –– during school –– and go to the downtown office on working time an dispute their pay. For that “missing in action” teacher a substitute had to be called in –– and paid –– while the teacher, was out of the building. Now that’s an expensive payroll adjustment! Another factor that led to complaints under the old system was Click here to read more. | |||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| Walk any manufacturing floor and you’ll see they are evaluating production levels, parts complete, all sorts of business data. However, one industry analyst told me that 75-80% of that data is out of date within two weeks to a month or more. The systems and processes to collect and analyze the data aren’t yielding much value to the organization when the data is that stale. The tools for collection are cumbersome, the data originates from disparate systems and participants in the process don’t have much motivation to keep things 100% complete and up to date. Go into any organization and ask workers to walk around with a clipboard and collect data. After a period of time, the participants begin to lag in their duties and the entire process declines in value. What’s new with workforce management technology entering into the mix is that workers are able to report data and see the results in real time. | In a real world example with a manufacturer, workforce analytics identified a “hidden factory” within its production process. A wiring harness was being shipped with wires crossed and line workers were fixing this problem. This non-value-added time was reducing their productivity. When the activity was reported the problem was identified in real time and a value engineer was called to the floor to evaluate the low outputs. The problem was quickly resolved. Another discovery at the same plant was that when work orders were released to the floor without 100% parts complete, the job took twice as long. The analytics tool played a major role in uncovering this non-intuitive problem and allowing the manufacturer to resolve this impediment to productivity. The result was that they exceeded their cycle time goal for that product, reducing it by more than half. What’s new is that the technology Click here to read more. | |||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| An outdoor equipment retailer in the northwestern United States, with dozens of stores located across the county, sells recreational and extreme sports equipment. Perhaps you’ve been in one of their stores. Each looks like a lodge, and the salespeople are all twenty-something with buff bodies and good tans. They sell hang gliding, skiing, cycling, camping, hiking, backpacking, and mountain climbing gear, along with other extreme outdoor recreational equipment. The company’s management team recognized a connection between individual store sales and staffing. So the team decided to go to an automated time and attendance system. In other words, WMT would be used to increase sales. Part of the strategy was to make the operation and implementation of WMT by store managers a mandatory core competency. The management team of this outfit “knew what they knew.” They knew their numbers and understood their customer traffic patterns and sales trends. They also had a good feel for the “soft side” of the sales process. Their marketing approach included employing sales people who enjoyed and participated in the outdoor sporting activities for which the equipment being sold was designed. So they hired guys and gals who like to rock climb and rappel and hang-glide and put them in the department that sold these goods. They knew their customers were enthusiastic about such purchases and reacted positively to the workers who shared their interests. A certain “match” existed between sales staff, products and customers. When everything was aligned, the perfect “sales chemistry” was created. The goal was to create this chemistry and to staff at a level that would return the maximum ROI (return on investment). They also knew that customers eventually get tired of waiting for someone to help them and will go somewhere else if they don’t get service within a reasonable length of time; this made the right number of sales personnel for the amount of traffic on a given day a must. Along with knowledge about what made the cash registers ring was an appreciation of how difficult it was to create this perfect chemistry without assistance. The team also realized that not every store manager was a natural “chemist.” Some were better than others at conjuring up this staffing magic. So they studied what the best managers did and figured out why and how they were successful. In this way, the management team came up with its own “best practices” based on what had worked in the past. Coupling statistical data on customer traffic along with sales and best practices, they knew their employees’ “score card stats” and were able to build a model for staffing. They knew what types of workers to schedule during specific seasons and during special sales events. You might say they viewed the work day as a sports team would game day. The team could predict with a fair degree of accuracy what store traffic would be at different times of year and on different days of the week. They knew what could be expected during a sales event such | as a ski equipment sale, or a mountain climbing bonanza. They developed a game plan, knew their players, and set out to break records. All they needed was the mechanism to make it happen. The retailer selected a workforce management technology vendor that understood the relationship between time and attendance and business objectives –– such as maximizing sales –– and offered a software product that fit the bill. For this retailer, Workbrain, Inc. became their partner. Management was purchasing a new tool. They were not simply installing a new timekeeping and scheduling system. Knowing what the expected outcomes were, the system had to be rolled out with a means for ensuring results. There’s a saying in engineering –– “you cannot expect what you are not willing to inspect.” The new owners of the time and attendance system must have come across this expression because they decided early on in the development of their plan to institute new job expectations for managers along with the new system. Not only would they train the managers on how to use the system, they planned to change how managers were evaluated at their annual performance reviews. Using set goals and best practices, a measurement for competency was determined. Management provided the targets –– increasing store sales –– along with the methods for reaching the targets –– best practices configured into the time and attendance system –– and the timetable for evaluating their aim –– “come to papa time” at the annual review. What this employer instituted was measurable accountability with tangible processes and tracking tools. Much more was involved than establishing a sales target. Ways were developed to evaluate how the managers worked within the system by considering actual inputs, decisions, deployments, mitigating factors and results. The managers knew their planning and reactions to the system indicators would be tracked and compared to the effect they had on store income. A hands-on tool was given to them to use every day in the pursuit of company targets. They knew it provided their leaders with visibility into how they were doing. The result was, this business tool became a part of the daily routine –– a front-end business driver. It became a tuning instrument to channel each store manger’s use of labor through a system with built-in standards, allowing the company to institutionalize best practices and to produce the desired sales results. Not only did the company achieve success and reach its sales goals, the technology also resulted in smarter, more cost-effective use of labor resources. If they scheduled the “kayaking king” to work even though he was paid a higher wage than the local novice, they expected better results. Better results meant more money, and enough more money meant more value for the labor dollars expended –– in other words, a better return on investment. This approach makes sense intuitively, but until now the benefits, if any, were difficult to quantify. For example, Click here to read more. | |||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| Some organizations don't happen to have hourly laborers. But even so, they don’t have to miss out on benefits that stem from the advances in automation. Unanet Technologies specializes in providing solutions for project-oriented organizations. The market for products that satisfy the challenges in the government sector, internal service organizations, consulting and advanced technology firms, is growing. Frances B. Craig, president of Unanet, explains that these organizations face three primary challenges –– paper based accounting processes, legal requirements and managing to insure top operational performance. It's easy to understand how automation would improve the inefficiencies, inaccuracies and timeliness of processes that have historically been done manually. Once an organization grows beyond 25 or more employees, business leaders dealing with paper or even electronic spreadsheet based processes can become overwhelmed with managing the “paper” instead of the core business. Errors in processing in these business models can mean not only overpaying employees, but also under-collecting earned revenue from customers. The regulations imposed on this industry are also a major concern. Strict guidelines, reporting requirements and the likelihood of being audited necessitate having an intelligent system to enforce policy, consistency and insure proper reporting. Without automation, imagine the manpower that would be required and the attendant cost an organization would incur just to stay in compliance. Finally, like any other business, these organizations have to stay on top of performance. Resource scheduling is crucial in the project world. What may be unique is that workers may be assigned to multiple projects concurrently, and the mix of how they spend their time can vary widely. Complicating project work is that resources | can be overbooked or under booked if labor isn't managed effectively. This can lead to project delays or underutilized resources. Unanet's solution not only manages this, but it also provides forecasting tools to predict and evaluate revenue and project completion targets. One feature needed in professional service labor tracking is the ability to keep tabs on hours worked relative to project completion. For agencies servicing government entities, requirements exist for how hours are to be tracked. The Unanet technology allows users to append comments and “Estimated Time to Completion” to the labor hours, adding another level to the usefulness of the data. Project expenses must also be tracked along with project hours. Unlike internal project expenses generally absorbed by overhead accounts or built in rate margins, these may be billed directly to the customer and have to be tracked alongside the work. Having one place to store all of this data is immensely helpful. The systems also integrate to project tracking formats such as Gantt charting so that data transfers seamlessly between different schedule mechanisms. Project profitability for service organizations can be managed using dashboards and tools that can track profitability by project, person and task. It’s important to know where companies are working under cost and truly making money. Summary reports offer high-level overviews and drill down so that managers at every level can understand at whatever level of detail required how the work is getting done. Revenue management is also key in project-oriented companies. And finally, systems like Unanet's provide Click here to read more. [link to www.workingtheclock.com] | |||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
| Having good labor cost and productivity data can be valuable in positioning a company for sale. How so? A lot of time and effort is spent tending to the assets of the company, but what about tending to the company as an asset? Business leaders, including those in small, privately owned companies –– not to mention corporate executives of large, publicly held institutions –– benefit when they look at their companies as they would a commodity on the market for sale. These “owners” are responsible for the health and appearance of the company. When a company is available for purchase, outsiders are going to examine it closely from an operational and financial perspective. For smaller, privately held companies, owners are eventually going to be concerned with succession planning or with positioning their company for sale at retirement. Why should workforce management technology be part of the business brokerage process? You've heard it said, no doubt, that the three most important things to consider when buying a | house are location, location, location. When buying a business, it's not so simple. Prospective buyers of a business will look at profitability and cash flow. As has been said, the only way to obtain a return is through profitable operations, and the only way to pay bills is through positive cash flow. WMT can provide data that will help a prospective purchaser understand the business and what its true costs are, as well as its sources of profitability and true profit potential. The numbers can be scrutinized from every angle. They can be reviewed by business line, profit center, individual product, or whatever the case may be, which should give a prospective purchaser a high degree of comfort about what he will actually be getting. If the buyer has a question, such as how much is spent to staff this or that unit, or the cost of maintenance or rework, it should be relatively easy to answer. Another concern from a buyer's perspective has to do with Click here to read more. | |||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||